Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Arguments Against Biden’s Mandates

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hold a public session Friday to hear arguments against President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate rules.

Biden announced two policies in 2021 that affect almost 100 million workers. The first policy is a vaccine and testing rule for private businesses with 100+ employees. The second policy is a vaccine mandate for any health care worker operating out of a facility that receives Medicaid and Medicare funding, except for those who qualify for religious and medical exemptions. The policies were announced in November but lawsuits have delayed enforcement.

The White House has maintained the mandates’ legality, with the administration continuing to push businesses to implement the vaccine and testing rule. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement Thursday evening that the policies “are critical to our nation’s COVID-19 response.”

“Unvaccinated Americans continue to face a real threat of severe illness and death — including from Omicron,” Psaki said. “The OSHA [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] rule ensures that employers are protecting their employees by encouraging workers to get vaccinated and requiring unvaccinated workers to mask and test. The CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] healthcare rule protects vulnerable patients by requiring that covered healthcare providers get vaccinated. The need and the urgency for these policies are greater than ever, and we are confident in the legal authority for both policies.”

The Supreme Court will first hear arguments surrounding the vaccine or testing mandate for private businesses, which Biden announced in September and OSHA issued rules on in November. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a temporary halt of this OSHA rule on Nov. 6. While it was upheld by the court on Nov. 12, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the ruling in December.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is arguing that OSHA’s ruling is legal because COVID-19 “is both a physically harmful agent and a new hazard” and that unvaccinated employees exposed to it are at the biggest risk of contracting, spreading, and subsequently suffering “serious health consequences.” The DOJ will also argue that the vaccine or testing rule is needed to protect employees from getting COVID-19 through working.

“[T]he nation is facing an unprecedented pandemic that is sickening and killing thousands of workers around the country, and any further delay in the implementation of the Standard will result in unnecessary illness, hospitalizations, and deaths because of workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2,” the DOJ will argue.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rolled out the second vaccine rule for health care workers in November. This would affect around 17 million workers and has been blocked by two lower courts in 24 states.

According to briefs, the DOJ will argue for this mandate that healthcare centers participating in Medicare and Medicaid have had to comply with rules adopted by the secretary of HHS for a long time. The DOJ also plans to point out that similar vaccine requirements have been adopted by healthcare centers around the U.S.

“[T]he exceptionally urgent need to reduce the risk of COVID-19 exposure for Medicare and Medicaid patients given the anticipated winter surge in infections tips the equities overwhelmingly in favor of a stay,” the DOJ will argue, pointing out the surge in cases in recent weeks due to the Omicron variant.

The justices will be hearing the case “on a rushed basis.” This means a ruling within days.

You Might Like
Previous Police Pull Over "Drunk Driver" But Instead Find Something Shocking In The Back Seat
Next Blinken Puts The Ball In Putin's Court When Pressed On Ukraine Invasion

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.