Sport · The Record
SEC calls its ex-pro roster rule unanimous; AP reports affidavit put the vote at 15-0
The conference's statement after Thursday's Baton Rouge ruling credits presidents and chancellors with adopting the rule unanimously. The commissioner's affidavit, as reported by the AP, put the presidents' vote at 15-0 with LSU's president abstaining - in a league the SEC's own complaint calls a sixteen-member association.

The Southeastern Conference gave the public one word on Thursday night: unanimously. The number reported to sit behind that word, taken from the commissioner's own sworn affidavit in a state courtroom 400 miles from the conference's federal filing, is 15-0.
Both landed on September 3, 2026. Hours before a Baton Rouge judge extended court protections for athletes who had turned professional, the conference sued LSU and its leadership in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Southern Division; the Associated Press reports the case was filed in northern Alabama because the SEC is based in Birmingham. The pleading names the university as a defendant and its head coach, Lane Kiffin, as another, and states that Kiffin has publicly confirmed that professional players are practicing with LSU's football team and that he intends to play them this season. The AP reports the suit alleges the school "waged a deliberate and coordinated campaign to recruit professional athletes" against league rules. That is an allegation in a complaint two days old. No answer from LSU appears in the captured record, and none of it has been tested.
The claim this piece weighs is narrower than the lawsuit. After Judge William Jorden granted the preliminary injunction, the conference issued a statement disagreeing with the ruling, published in full by Saturday Down South and carried in part by WAFB in Baton Rouge. Its opening sentence credits the rule to the unanimous adoption of the SEC's presidents and chancellors, and its second asserts the conference's right to set the terms its members compete under and "to expect those rules to be followed." Neither capture names a speaker. The words belong to the institution, and this desk attributes them no further: not to the commissioner, not to any president.
The same proposition reached a federal judge that morning in a different register. One passage in the capture of the complaint states that every SEC member institution, LSU included, "has affirmed that individuals who choose to leave college athletics, sign professional playing contracts, and compete professionally should not then be permitted to return to college competition." The suit is pleaded as a First Amendment case about expressive association, and among the relief it seeks is a declaratory judgment that the amendment protects the conference's right to disassociate from the defendants' conduct. The adverb turns up in the pleading too, attached there to the conference's long-standing rejection of the practice rather than to any tally.
The record that tests the word is an affidavit this desk has not seen. What is captured is the AP's account of it: Sankey provided an affidavit stating that the SEC's presidents voted 15-0 for the new rules, with LSU's Wade Rousse abstaining. The denominator comes from the conference's own pleading, which describes the SEC as a sixteen-member association. Fifteen votes cast in a sixteen-member league, one abstention, and the abstaining member is the school the conference sued the same day.
Three limits, stated before anything is drawn from the comparison. First, unanimous is a defensible description of a 15-0 vote with an abstention: an abstention is not a no, and governing bodies routinely describe a carried vote that way. Second, the statement speaks of presidents and chancellors while the reported affidavit counts presidents; HottyToddy reported in August that the conference's presidents, chancellors and athletic directors put the policy in writing and gave Sankey authority to enforce it, so the two bodies are not obviously the same set of voters. Third, the passages of the complaint available here are an excerpt rather than the full pleading: the captured portions state no tally and mention no abstention, which is not the same as establishing that the document contains neither.
What survives those limits is one passage in the capture. Told to a court, the sentence is not that the members voted unanimously but that every member institution has affirmed the standard, with LSU named inside the clause. On the AP's account of the affidavit, LSU's president is the one participant who did not vote for it. Rousse's own public words, reported by WAFB, addressed the ruling rather than the rule: "LSU respects the judicial process and the court's decision. Our responsibility is to support our programs while complying with the law and the rules governing our conference." No snapshot connects that statement to the abstention or states LSU's position on the rule itself; the link between them is this desk's framing, not the record's.
A second pair of documents sits oddly together. The statement claims the right to expect the rules to be followed, while another unnumbered passage in the capture of the complaint filed hours earlier tells the court that "The SEC does not bring this action to declare any student-athlete ineligible or to prevent any student-athlete from participating in any athletic competition." Read strictly the two are compatible - one addresses member universities, the other student-athletes - and the AP reports the conference argued in a brief filed Wednesday that the narrow question is whether it "can enforce and require its member institutions to comply with SEC rules." The pressure point is that the penalties the AP reports the conference proposed, among them fines, coach suspensions of up to half a season and the loss of votes on league business, fall on the schools whose rosters are the athletes' only route onto the field.
While the complaint was being filed, Sankey was on the stand in Baton Rouge. WAFB reported that he testified rules barring professional athletes from returning to college competition have existed since at least 1911, and quoted him: "The NFL is not a recruiting ground for college football." In the gallery, the AP reports, sat Zxavian Harris, formerly of the New Orleans Saints, and Dae'Quan Wright, formerly of the Cleveland Browns; both hope to join LSU under Kiffin, as does former Denver Broncos defensive back Blake Cotton. Harris and Wright each testified, according to WAFB, that they earned seven figures during their college careers, Wright putting his NIL income above that mark, and that the professional clubs they signed with never paid them. Governor Jeff Landry disputed the label attached to the group, writing that calling them NFL players was "at best disingenuous, and at worst intentionally deceptive".
The two-school fight is a slice of something much larger. The NCAA counts approximately 450 athlete plaintiffs seeking extra eligibility through litigation, the AP reports, roughly 300 of them cleared to play for now and about 150 turned down. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill filed an amicus brief calling the sequence a "classic bait-and-switch," arguing that athletes took the NCAA at its word and left college football behind. The AP also reports that Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr sent Sankey a letter urging every available penalty against LSU if former NFL players joined its 105-player roster; that letter is not in this desk's captured record and reaches this piece at second hand.
Analysis, drawn only from the documents above: the conference's difficulty is not the arithmetic, which is defensible, but the venue. Unanimously is a word for a statement to the public. one passage in the capture is a sentence in a pleading before a federal judge, and it asserts something stronger than a 15-0 tally supports - that the defendant itself affirmed the standard - while the conference's own affidavit in the parallel case records that the defendant's president abstained. Both documents were produced by the same institution on the same day, and both are now in front of courts.
A falsifiable prediction on this record: LSU's season opener against Clemson this weekend will be played with the Baton Rouge injunction still barring SEC enforcement against the affected players. Checkable by September 12, 2026.
What a reader can check next
LSU's 2026 roster was due to the SEC on Friday, and the AP reports the letter sent to Sankey put the roster at 105 players; whether the former professionals are on it is a document, not a debate. The Tigers open against Clemson this weekend. The next test of the claim in this piece is whether any SEC filing in either case states a vote count, and whether that count is 15-0 or 16-0. And at the September 3 hearing, the AP reports, Judge Jorden also wanted the NCAA to explain why it should not be held in contempt over the power conferences' penalties; no snapshot available here records how that question ended.